Australia: The battle to get decodable texts into the literacy curriculum

News articles, interviews, research, events and lots more - ready for your comments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Australia: The battle to get decodable texts into the literacy curriculum

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Followers of the literacy and reading debate may know that giving children cumulative, decodable texts and reading books to read that match the alphabetic code they've been taught can make a substantial difference to their reading outcomes (and associated self-esteem too). It isn't even rational or fair to give children books to read independently that they cannot read without constantly resorting to guessing the words rather than giving them books to read that they can apply their code knowledge and decoding skill enabling them to be successful and build up confidence and fluency.

This is not a small issue, it is a huge issue. So much so, that IFERI has provided a printable document to describe this, see here:

http://www.iferi.org/wp-content/uploads ... oned-1.pdf

I have been asked by Kate Gurjian to post the following description of the travesty in Australia with regard to the official Australian Curriculum:
Debbie - please can you insert the following:

Currently, and is evident in my private practice enrolling more than 100 children per year, the instructional casualties are rife – every child, bar none, are the result of teachers refusing to understand that decodable books are a necessity.

Berys Dixon’s article, What happened to the ‘D’ word? responds to the fact that the Australian Curriculum includes; ‘decodable texts’ as part of the Foundations and Year One Outcome, but in the Queensland, Victoria and New South Wales version of the curriculum it has been omitted. See below:

Australian Curriculum - Receptive modes (listening, reading and viewing) By the end of the Foundation year, students use predicting and questioning strategies to make meaning from texts. They recall one or two events from texts with familiar topics. They understand that there are different types of texts and that these can have similar characteristics. They identify connections between texts and their personal experience. They read short, decodable and predictable texts with familiar vocabulary and supportive images, drawing on their developing knowledge of concepts of print, sounds and letters and decoding and self-monitoring strategies.

BUT...

NSW Curriculum -

Reading and viewing 1

Outcome

A student:

ENe-4A demonstrates developing skills and strategies to read, view and comprehend short, predictable texts on familiar topics in different media and technologies

Kate Gurjian
Founder | Educational Specialist | Author
DIRECTOR | Time to Shine Australia Pty Ltd A.C.N. 615 048 729

Time To Shine Education
E kate@timetoshineaustralia.com
W http://www.timetoshineaustralia.com
M +61 414 555 916
Level 4 Shop 36
Gordon Village Arcade NSW

Note that the word 'decodable' has been omitted from the NSW curriculum above!

Whether teachers are trained and/or knowledgeable about the findings of a body of research on reading, and whether they provide an experience for children informed by science, guided by an evidence-informed official curriculum, and whether children are provided with books to read that they cannot read, or that they struggle to read rather than being provided with books to read that they can read, should not be left to CHANCE.

We know a huge amount about how best to teach reading effectively - and the improvement in the scores of England's statutory end of Year One Phonics Screening Check year on year is an indicator of the fact that teachers can teach knowledge and skills more effectively - same teachers, same children, change of content and approach, better results. This is huge. Thankfully, it is looking like Australia may soon launch its own phonics screening check which may well be a much-needed wake-up call for officials in Australia who have yet to take on board the research findings and ensure guidance that is best for all children.
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Australia: The battle to get decodable texts into the literacy curriculum

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

See page 28 to read Berys Dixon's excellent and important article What happened to the 'D word'? in an excellent and important newsletter published by the Learning Difficulties Australia (LDA) organisation:

https://www.ldaustralia.org/client/docu ... 202016.pdf
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Australia: The battle to get decodable texts into the literacy curriculum

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

See IFERI's recommendation for universal adoption of a Year One Phonics Screening Check (the same or similar to England's check to enable the greatest objectivity) to indicate the picture of children's levels of alphabetic code knowledge and decoding skill:

http://www.iferi.org/resources-and-guidance/
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Australia: The battle to get decodable texts into the literacy curriculum

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Here is a link to Australia's news re official adoption of a Year One phonics screening check - this is a fantastic development:

http://www.iferi.org/iferi_forum/viewto ... ?f=2&t=725
Post Reply