Victoria, Aus: 'Liberals $220m phonics focus aims to ‘end guesswork’ in learning to read'

News articles, interviews, research, events and lots more - ready for your comments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Victoria, Aus: 'Liberals $220m phonics focus aims to ‘end guesswork’ in learning to read'

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Liberals $220m phonics focus aims to ‘end guesswork’ in learning to read

Annika Smethurst and Adam Carey
October 4, 2022
https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 5_Smokc7PQ
Victorian primary school teachers will be required to adopt a phonics-based reading approach meaning students will be taught to sound out words under a Coalition plan aimed at bolstering literacy skills.

The opposition will on Tuesday unveil a plan that would, if it wins next month’s state election, in effect mandate the use of phonics in Victorian schools. Under the proposal, a new screening check would be introduced so that 18 months after students start school they would be tested to see if they are using the technique to decode unknown words.

Opposition education spokesman David Hodgett told The Age, it was time to “end the era of guesswork” in Victoria and roll out an “evidence-based reading approach”.

The proposed $220 million investment in systematic synthetic phonics – a method which teaches students the link between letters and the sounds they represent – will also include funding for books, lesson plans and training to help all Victorian primary schools transition to the same model for reading instruction.

After decades of debate about the best approach to early reading instruction, some states including South Australia and NSW have started to prioritise phonics. While many Victorian schools also teach phonics, it is often used in combination with whole language practices that encourage children to recognise entire words based on pictures and context.

The plan has been backed by Pamela Snow, professor of cognitive psychology at La Trobe University’s School of Education, who said it was currently left to Victorian schools to decide which method they used to teach children to read, creating a “lottery” for parents.

“That gives schools an enormous amount of flexibility, but it can’t all be best practice,” Snow said.

“It is time to end the debate on literacy education and let explicit phonics teaching be the standard starting point in schools, not the ambulance that is wheeled in as an after-thought when students struggle.”

As part of the Coalition’s plan, all Victorian primary schools will also be required to test students halfway through year one using a screening check based on a British test where students are asked to read a list of phonically decodable words where half the words are real and the others are made up.

Last month the Andrews government committed to introducing a mandatory screening test for students at the start of grade one to check whether pupils have grasped the fundamentals of using phonics in the first 12 months of school.

The Coalition has also promised to provide schools with “high-quality lesson plans” as well as decodable books which often have a simple narrative but primarily contain words with the sound-letter combinations that children have been taught, allowing them to use their decoding skills.

But Lucinda McKnight, a senior lecturer in education at Deakin University and an expert on teacher autonomy, said relying on decodable readers could deter some students.

“What is the quality of these readers when we know it is so important for students to be captured by reading and develop a love of reading?” she said.

She also warned against forcing teachers to take a one-size-fits-all approach to language and literacy education, saying it was important for teachers to be able to choose the theories and texts they use in the classroom.


“What is the quality of these readers when we know it is so important for students to be captured by reading and develop a love of reading?” she said.

She also warned against forcing teachers to take a one-size-fits-all approach to language and literacy education, saying it was important for teachers to be able to choose the theories and texts they use in the classroom.


“Students are incredibly diverse, and we are meant to be differentiating for their different needs. How do you do that if a program is systematic, and it’s just handed to you?” McKnight said.

The Coalition would also appoint an independent panel to help develop a revised literacy curriculum, recommend classroom resources and lesson plans.

“For teachers, where is the joy, where is the creativity?” McKnight said.

But Snow said English was the most complex alphabetic code in the world, and it wasn’t possible for a range of approaches to all be best practice. She said the current ad-hoc approach to literacy education left oral language and reading skills “too much to chance” and an intervention was needed to ensure disadvantaged students weren’t left behind.

“The end point is a widening gap between the haves and have-nots.”

As part of the multimillion-dollar election promise, the Coalition will also boost school-based support services for students with funding for 50 extra school nurses and 150 allied health specialists such as psychologists and speech pathologists to work alongside teachers.

The policy follows an earlier election pledge by the Coalition to review the state’s curriculum for prep to year 10 students. Opposition Leader, Matthew Guy, promised to make Victorian children the best readers “by implementing better resourcing and evidence-based reading programs” in schools.

User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Victoria, Aus: 'Liberals $220m phonics focus aims to ‘end guesswork’ in learning to read'

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Professor Pamela Snow writes a post via her excellent, research-informed blog, in response to edu-political developments in Victoria:
Once more for the people at the back

8 Oct 2022
https://pamelasnow.blogspot.com/2022/10 ... -back.html

It’s been a busy few weeks with respect to discussion and debate about literacy in the public domain. I have been interviewed a number of times by print and electronic media and inevitably only segments and sound-bites of my comments are used, so there’s not much nuance in the discussion.

Two key events in Victoria have been catalysts for this media activity:

1. The announcement by the Victorian Department of Education that a Year 1 Phonics Screening Check will be mandated in this state as of 2023. Details of this plan are still to be announced, but I am at least assured that it will include pseudo-words, which are essential, as I will explain in more detail below.

2. The release by the state opposition of its literacy policy, which privileges systematic and explicit reading instruction, accompanied by well-resourced teacher professional learning and an increase in the speech-language pathology workforce in schools to support the development of children’s oral language skills and their reading progress.

My tracking of the mainstream and social media coverage of these announcements flagged up the usual misconceptions, deliberate or otherwise, so I thought it might be helpful to lay some of these to rest in one place, hence this blog post.

As you read through these points, give some thought to Chesterton’s Fence, a concept I first encountered when listening to an interview with Stephen Fry. The Chesterton’s Fence parable reminds us that taking things away (when we didn’t understand why they were there in the first place) is easy. Re-instating them is infinitely more difficult.
Do read the full piece as it addresses important misunderstanding about reading instruction and the lingering debate. I certainly notice in 'readers' comments' in various Australian papers that misunderstanding and criticism abounds regarding how best to teach reading and to various political actions to address low levels of literacy in Australia. The impression is that resistance to the findings of research remains high!
Post Reply