Dan Willingham: Read to kids. but not necessarily from birth

This is a dedicated forum to allow parents to post questions, discuss issues and to ask for, and receive advice about, any concerns they may have regarding their children and the reading instruction that they are given at school.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Dan Willingham: Read to kids. but not necessarily from birth

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Dan Willingham applies his usual common sense to the proclamation of others:

http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel- ... ry/reading
...I think reading aloud to children is good advice. Still, there are a couple of ways I’d tweak the suggestion.

First, “from birth” is too early. It’s too early because parents of newborns really do have other, more pressing things to think about such as sleeping, and figuring out how family routines change with the new family member. It’s also too early because a newborn probably is not getting that much out of being read to. Newborn can’t really see much of a book—their vision is 20/500, and they don’t see blues very well until around age 3 months. And babies are much more social at a few months of age. My fear is that parents of newborns will either ignore the advice given their other concerns, or try to follow it, find it unrewarding, and drop it...
Meraud
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:45 am

Re: Dan Willingham: Read to kids. but not necessarily from birth

Post by Meraud »

And in the mean time, talk and sing to them as much as you possibly can.... :)
Post Reply